What is agile without a cross-functional, self-managing team? This empowered value-creating unit iterating both what they are building and how they are building it, constantly gathering feedback, reflecting and learning. All the time, guided by a servant-leader focused on Scrum Mastery – using the principles and values of agile to make the framework of Scrum unnecessary.
The term servant-leadership originated from an essay by Robert K. Greenleaf in 1970, “The Servant As Leader” where he essentially calls for a reversal of traditional leadership (the accumulation and exercise of power by one person at the top of the pyramid). Instead, Greenleaf calls for a leader whose focus is to ensure that other people’s highest priority needs are being served.
The guiding principle of servant leadership states that “the highest priority of a servant-leader is to encourage, support and enable subordinates to unfold their full potential and abilities.”
Many people find themselves dropped in to the role of Scrum Master with little preparation other than a two-day introductory course. Some find themselves asked to be Scrum Master for multiple teams while others are asked to do the role on top of their main job.
It’s no surprise that these people barely grasp the role let alone master it. As a result the team, the product and the organisation suffers. When I’ve seen people allowed to grow into the role through focus, support, coaching and mentoring, not only do they thrive but they actually create an organisation that has the potential to outgrow the need for Scrum.
While almost anything is possible, absolutely everything has consequences and while this is not as bad as being the Product Owner at the same time as being the Scrum Master, the extra confusion, conflict of interest and general over-burden means it’s highly unrecommended.
Great Scrum Masters have great facilitation skills and a range of what is often referred to as “soft skills”. The great Scrum Masters I know have high levels of emotional intelligence and resilience as well as the core characteristics I call out in my book Scrum Mastery:
RESPECTED
They have a reputation for integrity both within the team and in the wider organisation
ENABLING
They are passionate about helping others be effective
TACTFUL
They are diplomacy personified
RESOURCEFUL
They are creative in removing impediments to productivity
ALTERNATIVE
They are prepared to promote a counter-culture
INSPIRING
They generate enthusiasm and energy in others
NURTURING
They enjoy helping both individuals and teams develop and grow
EMPATHIC
They are sensitive to those around them
DISRUPTIVE
They break the old status quo and help create a new way of working
Short answer = No!
These roles are explicitly meant to be different people and doing them both not only means you will quickly get burnout but you also introduce a huge amount of unnecessary risk to the team, product and organisation due to the huge conflict of interest.
A great friend of mine – Michael James – once said:
A good Scrum Master can probably cope with up to three teams. A great Scrum Master focuses on one.
Please fill out the form below to download your file.